d’Hive · Public pilot
Open for deliberation

Great Britain’s electricity strategy through 2035

What electricity-generation strategy should Great Britain pursue through 2035?

Compare renewables-led clean power, Reform UK’s cost-and-security-first reset, and a nuclear-centred low-carbon route.

Leading proposals

Proposal ◈ RECONSTITUTED · d’Hive reconstruction

Build renewables-led clean power backed by firm and flexible capacity

Expand wind and solar rapidly, supported by nuclear, storage, interconnectors, networks, demand flexibility and dispatchable backup.

Arguments + 2Arguments − 2Evidence 0Forecasts 2Metrics 0Comments 0

Reconstruction: deliver renewables-led Clean Power with nuclear, batteries, long-duration storage, interconnectors, networks, demand flexibility and dispatchable backup. Published 2030 ranges are 43–50 GW offshore wind, 27–29 GW onshore wind, 45–47 GW solar, 23–27 GW batteries, 4–6 GW long-duration storage and 12–14 GW interconnection, with unabated gas generation toward 5%. Continue transition through 2035.

Caveat: ranges are not guaranteed outcomes or a complete fixed 2035 mix.

Source: DESNZ — Clean Power 2030 Action Plan · Open reference

By UK Government · 31 Aug 2026
2net support
+ 2− 0
Sign in to vote
Proposal ◈ RECONSTITUTED · d’Hive reconstruction

Make firm nuclear power more central to clean electricity

Continue decarbonisation but give nuclear greater weight and reform planning and regulation.

Arguments + 2Arguments − 2Evidence 0Forecasts 0Metrics 0Comments 0

Reconstruction: maintain low-carbon objectives while making firm nuclear more central alongside renewables and flexibility. Reform planning, regulation and delivery, extend viable stations and accelerate large and modular nuclear.

Caveat: this synthesis does not invent precise 2035 generation shares.

Source: Policy Exchange — Expediting Civil Nuclear Power · Open reference

By Policy Exchange · 31 Aug 2026
0net support
+ 0− 0
Sign in to vote
Proposal ◈ RECONSTITUTED · d’Hive reconstruction

Put cost and security first and roll back the renewables-led Net Zero strategy

Remove green levies and subsidies, reassess Net Zero and expand reliable domestic energy including oil and gas.

Arguments + 2Arguments − 2Evidence 0Forecasts 0Metrics 0Comments 0

Reconstruction: prioritise affordability and security over the current Net Zero timetable. Remove or reduce green levies and subsidies, reassess renewable commitments and network costs, and permit greater domestic energy including oil and gas.

Caveat: no sufficiently detailed comparable 2035 generation mix is supplied; none is invented here.

Source: Reform UK — Our Contract with You · Open reference

By Reform UK · 31 Aug 2026
-1net support
+ 0− 1
Sign in to vote

Compare proposals

Shared metricBuild renewables-led clean power backed by firm and flexible capacityMake firm nuclear power more central to clean electricityPut cost and security first and roll back the renewables-led Net Zero strategy
Curtailment and balancingNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Capital investmentNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Gas generationNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Carbon intensityNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Fuel import exposureNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Consumer electricity priceNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Reliability and securityNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied
Whole-system electricity costNo forecast suppliedNo forecast suppliedNo forecast supplied

forecasts

Forecasts

Forecast

Published Clean Power capacity ranges

The plan expects the listed capacity ranges and at least 95% clean generation by 2030.

Supports: Build renewables-led clean power backed by firm and flexible capacity

ModeQuantitative
PredictionPublished ranges; not guaranteed
By d’Hive steward · 31 Aug 2026
1net support
+ 1− 0
Sign in to vote